Diddy Trial Day 18 Summary: The second victim of combs concludes the ‘humiliating’ interrogation

A former Assistant of Sean “Diddy” combs concluded three days in the witness post, with the lawyers of the music tycoon who ravaged her so intensely that a prosecutor asked the judge to stop the interrogation, called him “humiliating” and “harassing.”

The witness, testifying under the pseudonym “Mia,” he told the jurors last week that combs tormented and sexually assaulted it during his time working as his personal assistant.

The defense lawyers tried to assault their credibility in their last two days that appeared on the stage, pressing it on dozens of text messages and publications on social networks that was the author of combs that were playful, respectful and even worshiped.

The combs lawyers argued that Mia misrepresented how ComBs treated her and manufactured part of her history. Mia remained greatly in his testimony, telling the jury that he was “washed by brain” by the combs and explained that he now wants to speak sincerely about the years of harassment and abuse he suffered.

“It’s the worst of what I had to talk in my life,” Mia told Mia about his reluctance to talk about how combs sexually assaulted her.

MIA’s testimony marked the beginning of the fourth week of testimony in the combs sexual traffic conspiracy trial. Prosecutors accuse that ComBs used their wealth and influence to direct a criminal company that served to protect their reputation and force women to sex.

If he is declared guilty for all positions, the music tycoon could spend the rest of his life after bars. Comps declared himself innocent, and his lawyers argue that, although he could have been violent with romantic couples and abused illicit drugs, he did not commit the crimes alleged by the Department of Justice.

Defensor lawyers emphasize MIA’s love messages

Continuing with his interrogation last week, defense lawyer Brian Steel returned to social media publications and Mia text messages to challenge the woman and the version of the events he shared with the jury.

“Life is crazy and supposedly everything happens for a reason to raise us in our human experience, but it is difficult,” Mia wrote in 2020, more than three years after she stopped working for him. “I love you with all my heart and I’m here for you forever.”

Steel also showed the jury other text messages of the 2019-2022 time frame in which MIA expressed love and admiration for combs.

“Hey. I saw our document in Netflix Top 10. Congratulations, I miss you,” I read a text message from July 2022.

Combs replied: “Love, love, love, love.” Mia replied: “And I love, I love you.”

“Everything is positive and loving of you to Mr. combs, would you agree with that?” Steel asked.

“Yes, of course,” Mia replied. He quickly explained to the jury that he was still “brain washed” by the combs of his years working for him.

Once the long and controversial interrogation of mine concluded, federal prosecutors tried to minimize any damage that could have been made to their credibility.

“Did you posted on social networks as part of your work?” Prosecutor Madison Smyer asked about the redirection exam.

“Yes,” Mia replied, adding that publishing about Ciroc, Diddy Door, Bad Boy meeting and Combs itself were part of their work. She described her Instagram publications “as the outstanding reel” of the combs and not intended for publications on the disadvantage of working for him.

“That’s why you didn’t posted on Mr. combs hitting Cassie’s head in a bed frame?” Smyer asked. “Yes,” said mine.

“That’s why you didn’t posted on Mr. combs by throwing a computer in the head?” Smyer asked. “Yes,” said mine.

“Is that why you didn’t publish about Mr. combs sexually assaulting you?” Smyer asked. “Yes,” said mine.

Steel tries to put doubts about mine asking why he did not documented abuse

Throughout his abundant interrogation, defense lawyer Steel tried to push holes in mine testimony highlighting how he did not documented the abuse that said he suffered from combs, even when he documented the advantage.

“Do you have any recording of Mr. combs that rebukes it?” Steel asked, who stressed that part of mine’s work was to wear a small camera to document the life of Combs. “No, I would not have allowed me to register that,” Mia replied.

“Because it’s not true, right?” Accused steel. “Your statements that you were the victim at the hands of Mr. combs of brutality is not true?”

Mia replied, testifying: “Everything I have said in this courtroom is true.”

Steel also questioned mine to escape the combs with ventura in Turks and Caicos by rowing the sea. Steel asked if there were text messages, emails or photographs that document those accusations.

“Was that done by you?” Steel asked promptly. “No,” Mia testified.

Steel’s next question: “How do all these events have no photograph, text message or email from you?” – He was arrested by the judge after an objection.

At one point, prosecutors asked the judge to supervise the case to intervene, arguing the “humiliating” interrogation borders in harassment and could deter other victims of the crime of presenting themselves in other cases.

“The eyes are in this trial. The victims in other cases will see how the victims are treated,” Comey said in a clear nod to the global headlines created by the combs trial. “Our concern is that if this victim is not protected from greater harassment, it will deter other victims in other cases.”

Judge Arun Subramanian said he did not hear screams and that he did not see inappropriate treatment, but that he warned Steel about the form of his questions.

Steel suggests that Mia manufactured her story after Ventura’s demand

Steel suggested that Mia timed her dissemination of alleged sexual aggression by Combs with the presentation of a civil demand by singer Cassie Ventura, the ex -life of the whole life of ComBs. Ventura is the star witness of the Prosecutor’s Office, and has alleged that ComBs abused her for a decade. His demand, the starting point for federal investigation that culminated in the current prosecution, was resolved after one day for $ 20 million, Tested testified. There was no admission of irregularities.

Steel questioned why mine did not tell federal prosecutors about his statement that ComBs sexually assaulted her until June 2024, six months after she began to meet with the authorities and seven months after Ventura’s civil lawsuit. The defense emphasized the jury that MIA met with federal prosecutors a total of 28 times.

“Do you remember the first time he made a claim that Mr. Comong sexually assaulted you on June 18, 2024?” Steel asked.

“I don’t remember dates, but I do remember that horrible conversation,” Mia replied.

In the redirection exam, Smyer asked Mia to clarify why federal prosecutors were known so often. “I met with the government both to understand my story and because I was very terrified and I was learning at the same time,” he testified, and, using the name of the previous street of combs, he said he was “terrified of Puff.” She said she has never been able to talk about her statement that ComBs sexually assaulted her without looking down.

“It’s the worst of what I had to talk in my life,” he explained.

The last witness tells the jury about the damage to the combs hotel room

The prosecutors concluded the day by calling Susan Oken, manager of the Beverly Hills Hotel, to testify about the times when ComBs was invited to his establishment.

She said Comed was recorded at the Beverly Hills under alias Hotel as “Frank Black” or “Phillip Pines” and Cassie Ventura appeared under the profile of combs as a guest.

Oken testified that combs once incurred an additional charge of $ 300 to clean the curtains and another $ 500 charge to clean the “oil damage.” Oken said the position reflected something “beyond the reach of what we would normally clean.” The prosecution of the Prosecutor’s Office was a call to the previous testimony about the so -called “monsters” orgies that combs would allegedly house and, according to the testimony, presented gallons of baby oil.

The court will resume on Tuesday with Eddie García, an employee of the Intercontinental hotel in Century City, California, the combs attack scene in the Chamber against Ventura that has perhaps created the most durable images to come from the high profile criminal trial.